<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Scene4 Magazine | Qreviews</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2</id>
   <updated>2008-08-24T02:18:19Z</updated>
   <subtitle>QREVIEWS—Short, little reviews on theatre, film, the arts and media. To post a new article or a comment to an existing article, click on the &quot;Post A New Article&quot; link on the right sidebar.</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Personal 4.1</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Victory at the Dirt Palace by Adriano Shaplin (SoHo Think Tank/Ice Factory 2008, Ohio Theatre, New York - Directed by Whit MacLaughlin.  August 20 - 23, 2008.) </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/08/victory_at_the_dirt_palace_by.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.586</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-24T02:00:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-24T02:18:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Paul Schnabel as James Mann and Stephanie Viola as K Mann - Photo by Abigail Feldman The Riot Group, using a script by co-founder Adriano Shaplin (who also performs along with Riot Group company members Paul Schnabel, Stephanie Viola, and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/PaulSchnabel_Stephanie%20Viola_web.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/PaulSchnabel_Stephanie%20Viola_web.html','popup','width=577,height=545,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/PaulSchnabel_Stephanie Viola_web-thumb-504x476.jpg" width="504" height="476" alt="PaulSchnabel_Stephanie Viola_web.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 0px 0px 0;" /></a></span><small>Paul Schnabel as James Mann and Stephanie Viola as K Mann - Photo by Abigail Feldman</small>

The Riot Group, using a script by co-founder Adriano Shaplin (who also performs along with Riot Group company members Paul Schnabel, Stephanie Viola, and Drew Friedman), sets many targets in its sights in this sharply drawn, occasionally tedious 90-minute piece.  The story, such as it is, follows the rise and fall of broadcast news rivals James and K. Mann, father and daughter (the "K" stands for Katherine, but she never refers to herself by that name).  Their head-to-head battle for ratings supremacy is also a stand-in for the passion play of a bitter father/daughter battle, with K. accusing James of his loving her "like cancer loves cells."  During K.'s premiere broadcast, terrorists attack the United States, cutting off all electrical power.  Within the space of ten minutes the US declares war, then wins the war it has declared, and, as power is restored, K. beats James to the usual insipid end-of-broadcast eulogy/paean delivered by news anchors about victory and heroism.  The overnight ratings declare K. the winner, and James resigns (to be replaced by his assistant Andrew).  But Andrew, not content with his victory, brings down K. by exposing photographs of K. in a leather S&M mask, photographs taken by K.'s assistant Spence (who is also K.'s sex partner), who is angling for his own rise up the corporate food chain.  The play ends with Andrew and Spence co-anchoring the nightly newscast that James had run for 30 years, while a chastened K. and James (now doing the weather report) work for a local TV station somewhere in America's heartland.  Each has his or her own "victory at the dirt palace," the lowest kind of victory, as K. points out.  Shaplin's satiric dissection of celebrity culture, the vapidity of the news media ("all news is jokes," James says at one point), and the operatics of family dysfunction are all intelligent and presented with humor and flair (thanks to Whit MacLaughlin's tight direction).  Yet Shaplin also has a love of his own voice and pours out metaphor-laden word-streams that often strain too hard for significance and delay or divert the story's unfolding.  And the choice to have the actors direct almost all their lines to the audience and the air (only rarely do the characters interact with each other) in essence makes the play a monologue and denies it the opportunity to build the kind of gravitational attraction among characters that creates dramatic tension.  "Victory at the Dirt Palace" is cerebrally interesting and sometimes culturally provoking, but it never goes beyond its own cleverness and bombast, in the end not looking or sounding very different from the celebratized superficial culture which it aims to demolish by parody.

<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Zombie by Bill Connington (FringeNYC 2008, adapted and performed by Bill Connington from the novella by Joyce Carol Oates.  August 9 - 21, 2008.) </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/08/zombie_by_bill_connington_frin.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.584</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-15T03:45:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-15T03:52:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Photo: Bill Connington as Quentin P., serial killer, with his favorite ice pick (photographer Tony David) What are we to make of &quot;Zombie,&quot; a one-actor piece about Quentin P., the queer sadistic sexual-psychopathic murderer who yearned to create a zombie...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Zombie_photo_A_web.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Zombie_photo_A_web.html','popup','width=396,height=596,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Zombie_photo_A_web-thumb-504x758.jpg" width="504" height="758" alt="Zombie_photo_A_web.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 0px 0px 0;" /></a></span><small>Photo: Bill Connington as Quentin P., serial killer, with his favorite ice pick (photographer Tony David)</small>

What are we to make of "Zombie," a one-actor piece about Quentin P., the queer sadistic sexual-psychopathic murderer who yearned to create a zombie who would obey him without question by performing home-made lobotomies with an icepick rammed up through his victims' eye-sockets?  "Zombie" is in that genre of theatre that uses the stage for the case-study of a psychological/psychotic condition (think "Equus"), in the hope of (in this order) titillating the audience through voyeurism and, perhaps, shedding some explanatory light on the "abnormal" (i.e., people not like the audience members).  But a script is not a case-study, imagination is not the same as the DSM-IV, and two-hours-with-intermission does not substitute for therapy. Inevitably the interpretive effort must always deliver less than it promises because, one, the audience is always more interested in titillation than explanation and, two, explanation can never be dramatic (think of how all those CSI shows try to tart up the lab tests with music and camera-work so that people won't switch the channel).  Well, then, if by the end of "Zombie" Quentin P. is still an unsolved riddle, what about the quality of the performance itself?  Again, "Zombie" delivers less than it promises. Directed by "Mamma Mia!" resident director Thomas Caruso, with set by Josh Zangen, lighting by Joel Silver, and sound by Deidre Broderick, Connington chooses to present Quentin as a sort of button-down nerd, with owl-eye-styled brown-rim glasses, slicked down combover, chinos, and a short-sleeve shirt who speaks in slow, upper-Midwest-themed accent.  All this is meant to contrast with the viciousness of his anecdotes about using the trash of society as his experiments in zombie-making.  Connington does well enough, though several line-flubs and Caruso's advice to play Quentin with only the slightest hint of animation drain off most of the story's vigor and danger.  But the choice to adapt this as a monologue is also partly to blame for the slightly soporific quality of the production.  No matter if the actor is talking to a stuffed dummy (the only "zombie" Quentin is able to create) or to the audience or to the air, the stage lacks a second center of gravity around which the dramatic action can orbit.  In addition, almost all the "action" in the piece is told in retrospect, not shown in the present tense, and so the piece becomes something more for the ear than the eye.  Finally, Connington just does not offer the kind of performance that turns the dialectic between the outward dweeb and the inner monster into a memorable hour upon the stage.  "Zombie" unfortunately feels too much like its title.

<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Heistman by Matthew Maher (SoHo Think Tank/Ice Factory 2008, Ohio Theatre, New York - Conceived and Directed by Gabriella Barnstone.  Reviewed August 1, 2008)</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/08/heistman_by_matthew_maher_soho.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.581</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-04T15:00:54Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-04T15:15:05Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Photo: Steven Rattazzi as the Heistman - Photographer: Brian McDermott In &quot;Heistman,&quot; Heistman, played by Steve Ratazzi, and his two cohorts (a man and a woman) have just taken over a bank and secured two female hostages when they...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/heistman1_web.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/heistman1_web.html','popup','width=504,height=557,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/heistman1_web-thumb-504x557.jpg" width="504" height="557" alt="heistman1_web.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 0px 0px 0;" /></a></span> <small>Photo: Steven Rattazzi as the Heistman - Photographer: Brian McDermott</small>

In "Heistman," Heistman, played by Steve Ratazzi, and his two cohorts (a man and a woman) have just taken over a bank and secured two female hostages when they are surrounded by the police and commanded to give themselves up by a police officer (Matt Oberg) barking through a megaphone.  However, instead of surrendering, Heistman proceeds to deliver the first third of "The Heist Man Manifesto" (the complete text of which, running for three double-sided single-spaced pages, is stuffed into the program).  The Manifesto begins with Personal Happiness and ends with The Fear, which he defines as "the fear that your life is a waste"; according to Heistman, it is The Fear which drives most people to do desperate things (such as robbing banks) to make their lives have meaning.  At this point, about 20 minutes into the 45-minute production, Heistman, driven by his own capital-F "Fear," is saved by the two hostages, who have somehow freed themselves from being tied up and who lead him and his two "associates" on a dance of self-peace.  This is all sort of a metaphoric and mildly interesting silliness, with ideas like "heist" and "hostage" and "giving up" laden with double and triple layers of "meaning," underscored by an eclectic sound design by Marcelo Añez, choreography by Barnstone (which is excellently performed by Ratazzi and Molly Lieber, Eleanor Smith, Carolton Ward, and Barnstone herself), and Paul Douglas Olmer's and Garin Marschall's effective set and lighting.  Ratazzi's performance is what gives the piece any intellectual heft that it has: by turns flippant, fear-laden, comic, and dangerous, Ratazzi turns the commonplaces of the Manifesto, which are a dull read on the page, into words with edges and possibilities.

<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>TRACES/fades by Lenora Champagne (SoHo Think Tank/Ice Factory 2008, Ohio Theatre, New York - Written and Directed by Lenora Champagne.  Runs until July 19, 2008</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/07/tracesfades_by_lenora_champagn.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.574</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-20T21:23:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-20T23:05:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary> (L-R) Amelie Lyons, Joanne Jacobson and Lenora Champagne - Photographer: Gary Breckheimer TRACES/fades runs about 75 minutes and is Ms. Champagne&apos;s &quot;meditation on Alzheimer&apos;s and our national inability to remember history.&quot; Therein lies the challenge with this sometimes affecting...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/traces-w-lenora_web1.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/traces-w-lenora_web1.html','popup','width=700,height=500,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/traces-w-lenora_web-thumb-500x357.jpg" width="500" height="357" alt="traces-w-lenora_web.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 0px 0px 0;" /></a></span> <small>(L-R) Amelie Lyons, Joanne Jacobson and Lenora Champagne - Photographer: Gary Breckheimer</small>

TRACES/fades runs about 75 minutes and is Ms. Champagne's "meditation on Alzheimer's and our national inability to remember history."  Therein lies the challenge with this sometimes affecting but often off-putting production: a mixture of themes and devices that have not been blended dramatically.  The script's constant references to wars and bumbling presidents and amnesiac societies is butted up against the central story of a memory-losing Ann (Joanne Jacobson) who, packed away in a nursing home, is beloved by her granddaughter (Amelie Champagne Lyons) and only marginally attended to by her daughter (played by Ms. Champagne).  Naturally, the old woman's story steals center stage because it is immediate and visceral as opposed to the more abstract commentaries on big-picture politics.  The play's structure mimics this uneasy link of part-to-part, with presentational elements morphing into song-singing to prettyish tunes by Daniel Levy and Lisa Dove to some very wry and wrenching interactions among the denizens of Ann's nursing home (Mary Fogarty, Matthew Lewis, and Judith Greentree) as they spar with their well-meaning but overwhelmed care-giver Nettie (Quanda Johnson) -- all of which are individually interesting but which are also not quilted into a dramatic whole.  (Not to mention the video projections by Shaun Irons and Lauren Petty of purling water under ice, snowstorms, hands that write then un-write what they've just written, and so on, which are more distracting than illuminating.)  The moments I found most touching were the ones ungussied by "theatrical device" and "author's message," such as when Nettie complains to Delores about how her getting-older body is thickening in the middle, and Delores responds, straight and acerbic, with "That's nothing.  Just wait.  Everything hurts."  Truth plain and unadorned in those words, and the audience, understandably, laughed in both recognition and commiseration.  Or when Nettie muses, "If we are what we remember, then who are we when we forget?"  Moments like those are what makes seeing TRACES/fades worth the effort. 

<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Crave by Sarah Kane (Potomac Theatre Project, Atlantic Stage 2, New York  Directed by Cheryl Faraone.  Runs until July 26, 2008) </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/07/crave_by_sarah_kane_potomac_th.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.572</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-12T23:54:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-12T23:58:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It is well-nigh impossible to hear Sarah Kane&apos;s aching meditation on the cravings for love, connection, and understanding minus the static bred by her suicide several months after the piece was written. But it is important to do so in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[It is well-nigh impossible to hear Sarah Kane's aching meditation on the cravings for love, connection, and understanding minus the static bred by her suicide several months after the piece was written.  But it is important to do so in order to judge the work as theatre.  Four voices, labeled A, M, B, and C (Adam Ludwig, Stephanie Janssen, Rishabh Kashyap, and Stephanie Strohm), sit in four chairs under occasionally shifted lighting and, in choral concert, interweave tales of yearnings for linkage, as if the default state of life is sadness and disconnect.  But "Crave" is not really a play, if by "play" is meant a narrative of change, revelation, reversal, conflict, "high stakes," and so on, and because of its non-play structure, all is told, not shown, over a hour's time, which makes "Crave" a presentation more for the ear than the eye.  As a consequence, its poetic earnestness, despite the talented efforts of director Cheryl Faraone and cast, becomes tedious and, in its tediousness, ironically reinforces the disconnect that A, M, B, and C (and Kane) struggle to nullify through their sad and lonely chorus.

<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Do Not Do This Ever Again by Karinne Keithley (SoHo Think Tank/Ice Factory 2008, Ohio Theate, New York  Directed by Maria Goyanes.  Runs until July 12, 2008)  </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/07/do_not_do_this_ever_again_by_k.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.571</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-12T18:23:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-12T18:24:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Do Not Do This Ever Again&quot; is a 90-minute intermissionless journey into &quot;a landscape of lost love and modern loneliness,&quot; though the multi-media&apos;d journey feels so much longer because about halfway through writer Keithley and director Goyanes decided to drop...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA["Do Not Do This Ever Again" is a 90-minute intermissionless journey into "a landscape of lost love and modern loneliness," though the multi-media'd journey feels so much longer because about halfway through writer Keithley and director Goyanes decided to drop humor and cheek and instead go portentious and sober. Broken into 3½ parts (the half-part is called "inter-part"), the talented eight-member crew of "Do Not..." drapes long swags of faux-meaningful text over the audience in order to decrease their oxygen supply and slip them into a hypnotic state where they will believe they are being shown something significant and insightful, when, in fact, they're only experiencing a low-grade delirium induced by the performance and a stuffy theatre.  Keithley and Goyanes also cram in some projections, movement, and music (both instrumental and vocal -- Katy Pyle's voice is actually the best thing in the show), but very little of it adds yeast to the unleavened core of Keithley's play.

<em>Michael Bettencourt </em> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Scenes From An Execution by Howard Barker (Potomac Theatre Project, Atlantic Stage 2, New York Directed by Richard Romagnoli.  Runs until July 26, 2008)</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/07/scenes_from_an_execution_by_ho.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.570</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-12T18:20:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-20T21:08:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary> (L-R): Peter Schmitz as Prodo and Jan Maxwell as Galactia - Photographer Stan Barouh Howard Barker is a hard playwright to feel warm about -- his primary characters make no concession to sentiment, and all of them, to one...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Execution.jpg"><img alt="Execution.jpg" src="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Execution-thumb-645x432.jpg" width="645" height="432" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 0 0px 0;" /></a></span><small>
(L-R): Peter Schmitz as Prodo and Jan Maxwell as Galactia - Photographer Stan Barouh
</small>

Howard Barker is a hard playwright to feel warm about -- his primary characters make no concession to sentiment, and all of them, to one degree or another, are fascinating monsters, driven by a complicated choreography with power that causes pain and dislocation as they cut their way through the world.  In "Scenes," Galactia, an unmatched painter with an unruly desire to tell the truth, is commissioned by the city-state of Venice to memorialize its greatest military triumph, the battle of Lepanto.  In the course of covering 3000 square feet of canvas, she manages to offend everyone from the Doge on down by choosing to portray slaughter rather than triumph.  But lest we take the the default liberal position of championing the artist over the state, Barker gives the state some pretty strong arguments about why we shouldn't trust artists to tell the truth, and in the end Galactia comes off both as a hero and a fool.  For the most part, director Richard Romagnoli has crafted a balanced and energized production, and Jan Maxwell has created a Galactia who may be impossible to love but who demands that we pay attention -- and we do, to our delighted agitation..

<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Somewhere in the Pacific by Neal Bell (Potomac Theatre Project, Atlantic Stage 2, New York Directed by Jim Petosa.  Runs until July 26, 2008)</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/07/somewhere_in_the_pacific_by_ne.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.569</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-12T18:17:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-20T21:14:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary>(L-R): James Smith as McGuiness and Malcolm Madera as Albers - Photographer Stan Barouh The ensemble work in this tale set on a troopship &quot;somewhere in the Pacific&quot; towards the end of World War II is very good, well-timed and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Pacific.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Pacific.html','popup','width=432,height=645,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/Pacific-thumb-432x645.jpg" width="432" height="645" alt="Pacific.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 0px;" /></a></span><small>(L-R): James Smith as McGuiness and Malcolm Madera as Albers - Photographer Stan Barouh</small>

The ensemble work in this tale set on a troopship "somewhere in the Pacific" towards the end of World War II is very good, well-timed and well-choreographed.  But while Neal Bell's core desire in the play, as told in his program notes, is to show how homophobia damages not only its target but also its targeters, from captain on down to private, his good intention gets lost in the play's clunky structure and its WWII-war-movie-inflected dialogue.  Director Jim Petosa also makes some ineffective choices, such as the staging of the last scene on a life-raft after the troop ship has been torpedo'd, that obscure Bell's message.  In the end, I was not clear why Bell wrote this play, what question he had in mind that the play answered, since the play seems as much about the complicated friendships among men under the crush of war as it does about the crush of prejudice and proscribed desire.

<em>Michael Bettencout</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Looking Up by Carla Cantrelle</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2008/02/looking_up_by_carla_cantrelle.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2008:/qreviews//2.460</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-21T21:15:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-21T21:19:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Running February 16-March 2, 2008, at Theatre for the New City in NYC. This two-actor show about finding love takes place in a bar that hosts a trapeze act(!). Wendy (Cantrelle), the trapezista, looks down to find Jack the bartender...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[Running February 16-March 2, 2008, at Theatre for the New City in NYC.  This two-actor show about finding love takes place in a bar that hosts a trapeze act(!).  Wendy (Cantrelle), the trapezista, looks down to find Jack the bartender (Bryant Mason) looking up at her, and together they brave a relationship filled with homilies about "hanging in" and "working without a net" (the symbolical wordplay gets thick during the show's 80 minutes).  Too often Cantrelle settles for stock relationship scenarios without digging deeply, which deprives the script of any real bite or surprise.  Still, the show is pleasant enough, especially with actual trapeze work done live onstage.
<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Virgin Love Vexed</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2007/11/virgin_love_vexed.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2007:/qreviews//2.376</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-06T00:32:01Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T05:17:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Hey, you must be an &quot;Angeleno&quot; and I&apos;m not. And that means that you live in a town with tons of live theater and other than the road shows, very few worth seeing. If you knew better, you would have...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[Hey, you must be an "Angeleno" and I'm not. And that means that you live in a town with tons of live theater and other than the road shows, very few worth seeing. If you knew better, you would have known that you were watching a "commedia" form that was pretty well carried off by the Montalban company. As I said before, the script was weak but the actors were fine and entertaining and the production was solid. Your major concern was the traffic and the ticket price and if you had gotten there righteously on time (which I understand isn't considered "cool" in this town)  you would have gotten the whole show and not missed the prologue and maybe understood what you were seeing. But, hey, you're an Angeleno, what do you know?
<em>Larry Marcus</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Review of Virgin Love from 11/2</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2007/11/review_of_virgin_love_from_112.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2007:/qreviews//2.375</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-05T23:48:34Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T05:17:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I just had to give my review. This was the all time worst play I have ever seen. It was poorly written, the songs and dialogue were crude (a song about an itchy crotch/catching an std?), and the actors all...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[I just had to give my review. This was the all time worst play I have ever seen. It was poorly written, the songs and dialogue were crude (a song about an itchy crotch/catching an std?), and the actors all seemed to shout their lines. I'm glad my date and I didn't speed through traffic just to get there in time. We arrived at 8:30 and saw maybe 20-25 other people in attendance. There was no need to pay extra for the center tickets. The theater itself and stage props were just about the only positive things going for it. I'm all up for raunchy/bawdy humor, but this was far from it. It was a mighty bore. I would have rather stayed home and watched repeats on TV.
<em> jeepgirl</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hamlet vs Hamlet</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2007/11/hamlet_vs_hamlet.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2007:/qreviews//2.374</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-05T23:37:42Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T05:16:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There are two masterful film versions of this great play: one by Olivier and one by Branagh. The major difference between the two is this—Branagh does the play justice, almost an unedited version of the play, with magnificent cinematography, production...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[There are two masterful film versions of this great play: one by Olivier and one by Branagh. The major difference between the two is this—Branagh does the play justice, almost an unedited version of the play, with magnificent cinematography, production design, and brilliant editing and of course, superb acting. 48 years earlier, there's Olivier. Given even a different sensibility at a different time, his production doesn't compare. But neither does Branagh's performance. Now put Olivier in Branagh's film and you would have one of the greatest films ever made.
<em>Mel Silverman</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Virgin Love in LA</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2007/11/virgin_love_in_la.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2007:/qreviews//2.373</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-05T23:25:19Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T05:14:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Weak script and only a few good tunes, but on the whole the performances were solid especially Lawrence Smilgys and Nicole Ortega and lots of kudos to the director, Felipe Alejandro, who really knows how to handle &quot;commedia.&quot; Set and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[Weak script and only a few good tunes, but on the whole the performances were solid especially Lawrence Smilgys and Nicole Ortega and lots of kudos to the director, Felipe Alejandro, who really knows how to handle "commedia." Set and costumes were fine too. Nice outing for this young company as it moves to the main stage in the Montalban. Keep it coming.
<em>Larry Marcus</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Leonardo DiCaprio’s &quot;The 11th Hour&quot; Calls Forth Humanity’s Finest Hour </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2007/08/leonardo_dicaprios_the_11th_ho.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2007:/qreviews//2.299</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-23T06:07:01Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-06T01:52:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In this summer&apos;s blockbuster hit Transformers, &quot;Decepticons&quot; from an alien species, wreak havoc on Earth – things look bad, humanity seems doomed. But just in the nick of time, against all odds, our young heroes save the planet. It’s an...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[In this summer's blockbuster hit Transformers, "Decepticons" from an alien species, wreak havoc on Earth – things look bad, humanity seems doomed. But just in the nick of time, against all odds, our young heroes save the planet. 
It’s an enduring Cliché: From Superman and Wonder Woman to Batman and Spiderman, we love to watch our celluloid heroes save us from whatever creatures are threatening our world.  In Leonardo DiCaprio's new documentary, <em>The 11th Hour</em>, the creatures are us.  And the ways in which we are wreaking havoc on planet Earth are far more frightening than anything dreamed up by Hollywood:  
--Injecting poisons into the atmosphere causing our children to choke and wheeze in an epidemic of asthma. 
--Dumping toxic chemicals into the oceans, killing 90 percent of the big fish. 
--Poisoning our food supply with pesticides, mercury, herbicides and more. 
--Hacking down whole forests vital to the sustainability of life on Earth. 
--Burning huge fossil fuel reserves, creating emissions that disrupt the fragile atmospheric balance that regulates temperature and makes Earth habitable. 
-- Contaminating our drinking water, melting our icecaps and killing off species forever. 
How would we react if an alien species did this to our planet? 
“Would we be outraged? I’m sure we would,” Leonardo said when I asked him this question at a Beverly Hills press conference. 
“We face a convergence of crises, all of which are a concern for life,” he says in the documentary. “Every living system is in decline – the forest cover, the soil, the oceans. There isn't one living system that is stable or improving. And those systems are required for life."  Life on Earth in peril? In a fiction film, people would be gathered around their TV sets, brows furrowed in worry, clutching their children to their breasts, anxiously awaiting some glimmer of hope for how humanity can fight back. But this is real. So is public anxiety even higher?  Not according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism.  Their analysis shows that so far global warming hasn’t even ranked with Anna Nicole Smith and Paris Hilton in the top-ten news stories.   
]]>
      <![CDATA[At the Cannes premier, Leonardo spoke about of the frustrations of working with a TV network on an environmental documentary in the late 1990’s. Every truth by a scientist had to be “balanced” by a lie from the industry. "We had to make it just two people arguing the same point back and forth and at the end of the day it just became moot."  DiCaprio was determined to make 11th Hour different. "This was really a homemade movie," DiCaprio said, “three of us in an editing room…We made it with private funding so that no studio and no network could impose their agenda on it.”  Despite DiCaprio’s stature in the industry, the movie was made on a shoestring. “This is all stock footage. We didn’t have nature crews going out there to Africa to get some of these scenic shots. It was done by a lot of people donating services. It was people with HD cameras interviewing people in my mother’s garage.”  Irmelin DiCaprio’s garage served as the stage for DiCaprio’s quest to learn firsthand from “some of the great experts and visionaries of our time.”  With his team, he built the film with an impressive array of 54 leading scientists, Nobel Prize winners, and professors, ranging from Scripps Institute oceanographer Jeremy Jackson and Stanford University Environmental Director Steven Schneider to former CIA director James Woolsey and former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, founder of Green Cross International.  “The evidence is now clear: industrial civilization has cause irreparable damage. Our political and corporate leaders have consistently ignored the overwhelming scientific evidence,” DiCaprio warns in the film as his experts ring in with a peal of alarm bells: “Not only is it the llth hour, its 11:59… What we saw with Katrina is just a prologue… The worst is yet to come. The UN estimates that by the middle of the century there may be 150 million environmental refugees… There are too many of us using too many resources too fast… The rate of decline is accelerating… The tragedy is the potential extinction of humankind."  Cambridge math professor and theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, whose medical condition requires him to speak with an eerily authoritative computer voice, sent chills down my back as he explained:  “The danger is that the temperature increase might become self-sustaining, if it has not done so already… the warming of the seas may trigger the release of large quantities of CO2 trapped on the ocean floor. In addition, the melting of the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets will reduce the amount of solar energy reflected back into space and so increase the temperature further. We don’t know where the global warming will stop, but the worst case scenario is that earth would become like its sister planet, Venus, with a temperature of 250 centigrade, and raining sulfuric acid. The human race could not survive in those conditions.”  Now hold on just a minute. We humans may be willing to take a lot of abuse, but are we going to let 'em threaten our planet? Destroy the human race? Fry poor Fido and our prized rose bushes?  No way. We won’t take that lying down! We know the drill –we’ve seen it in movie after movie – at the last minute our mighty heroes will muster the courage and fortitude to persevere in a life and death battle to save our beleaguered planet. I asked DiCaprio who’s going to be the hero who swoops in to rescue us at this 11th hour?  “I think there’s gotta be millions of heroes. That’s my answer to that,” DiCaprio said.  So he won’t be our celluloid hero who saves the day? We have to be our own heroes?  Isn’t that asking a bit much?  “During this critical period of human history, healing the damage of industrial civilization is the task of our generation,” DiCaprio says in the film as his experts demonstrate that we already have the technological know-how to reduce the human footprint on Earth by 90 percent. “Our response depends on the conscious evolution of our species and this response could very well save this unique blue planet for future generations.”  What led an actor like DiCaprio to take on such a complex and seemingly overwhelming cause?  “I became an actor at a very young age but I also had a deep respect for nature. I was sort of a little biologist– I watched documentaries on rain forest depletion and the loss of species and habitats for animals around the world and it affected me in a very emotional way. So later in life I wanted to investigate and learn more about ecological issues. That sent me eventually into a room with Al Gore about 10 years ago who explained to me what climate change was and global warming and the science behind that and the decades of research that he’d done on the subject matter. It really propelled me to want to be more vocal about the issue because it seemed to me we’re at a real tipping point – the weather patterns, the floods and hurricanes – all these things made me more proactive in the environmental movement.” 
Leila Conners Petersen and her sister Nadia Conners directed the documentary and Brian Gerber produced it. We interviewed them between sessions in the editing room where they were putting final touches on the images of our planet being battered by multiple assaults on its very life systems. 
“We’re kind of in a pitched battle to save what we have and not to continue the destruction,” Nadia Conners told us. 
“Are you frightened by the threat of global destruction?” I asked. 
“When we first started making this movie, I was worried about the bad news, and felt that we were going down as a civilization and as a planet. But After interviewing all these people, I couldn’t be more hopeful. I feel that we are really going to turn this around and that not only is the planet going to be better off, but human beings are going to be better off.”  “I don’t believe that people maliciously wake up in the morning saying I’m going to hurt the earth today,” her sister Leila added. “All of this is simply a by-product of the way we constructed society. So we just have to redesign our society at every level so that it doesn’t destroy the planet.”  Conners didn’t seem at all daunted by the scope of this task. Instead she cites her favorite line in the film, author Paul Hawken saying: ‘What an exciting time to be born, what an exciting time to be alive, because this generation gets to completely remake this world.’  11th hour is a stunning film. It is packed with facts we human beings need to know to save our planet. It is the ultimate horror movie, action flick and feel-good movie all wrapped up into one. We all owe it to ourselves and our future to all go see it.  In the memorable words of Pogo: “We have met the enemy, and he is us!” 
© 2007 Arthur Kanegis. Kanegis reviewed <em>The 11th Hour </em>for Scene4 Magazine. Kanegis' interviews with the film directors Nadia Conners and Leila Conners Petersen are available at <a href="http://www.scene4.com/html/arthurkanegis-i0807.html">http://www.scene4.com/html/arthurkanegis-i0807.html</a> In addition to reviewing films, Kanegis is a screenwriter, producer and President of One Films, LLC. Contact: <a href="mailto:ArthurKanegis@Hotmail.com">ArthurKanegis@Hotmail.com</a>. 
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Fringe NYC 2007: DIRT </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/2007/08/fringe_nyc_2007_dirt.html" />
   <id>tag:www.scene4.com,2007:/qreviews//2.294</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-19T21:15:27Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-06T01:52:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Christopher Domig executes this one-person show by Robert Schneider (originally written in German in 1993, translated by Paul Dvorak). DIRT is a monologue by Sad (short for &quot;Saddam&quot;), an Iraqi living illegally in some modern city, and in this cry...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scene4.com/qreviews/">
      <![CDATA[Christopher Domig executes this one-person show by Robert Schneider (originally written in German in 1993, translated by Paul Dvorak).  DIRT is a monologue by Sad (short for "Saddam"), an Iraqi living illegally in some modern city, and in this cry from the heart by this accomplished actor we are tutored about the deforming pressures of racism and intolerance on those who are considered outside the family, the state, and the nation.  While its ideas and images are relevant and powerful, DIRT is essentially a lecture delivered through theatre devices and thus not very dramatic, which makes the 70-minute running time feel longer than it is.
<em>Michael Bettencourt</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
