|
A new story ballet is a double challenge when a celebrated version already exists in the repertoire: John Cranko’s Onegin (1965)
which was performed
here to great
acclaim ten years
ago. The
choreographer of the
new Eugene Onegin,
Yuri Possokhov, is a
former
Bolshoi-trained
dancer and the
stalwart
Choreographer in
Residence at SF
Ballet, where he
created a number of
noteworthy works. My
reviews of his
superb 2015 Swimmer as well as his recent version of Anna Karenin (co-commissioned
by the Joffrey
Ballet like Eugene Onegin)
can be found in this
archive. While
Cranko used music by
Tchaikovsky,
Possokhov used a new
score by his
long-time friend and
collaborator Ilya
Demutsky.
I am familiar with
Pushkin’s
verse novel both in
the rhymed and
the literal
translation by
Vladimir Nabokov,
and I watched the
opera by Tchaikovsky
many times. What
would be new and
surprising in Yuri
Possokhov’s
new version of the
story? It’s
the story of two
mismatched couples:
the shy, bookish,
dreamy Tatiana and
the worldly,
disillusioned Onegin
on the one hand, and
her
light-hearted,
flighty sister Olga
with Onegin’s
only friend, the
sensitive poet
Lensky. Tatiana
falls in love with
Onegin, writes him a
passionate love
letter and promptly
gets her heart
broken by his
haughty, humiliating
rejection. Lensky,
who loves Olga more
than she loves him,
is wounded to the
core when Olga lets
Onegin seductively
flirt with her at a
ball given for
Tatiana at their
country estate. In
their dispute and
ensuing duel Onegin
kills his friend and
ruins Olga’s
reputation. Several
years later, after
haunted travels
abroad, Onegin
returns to Russia
and finds a
transformed Tatiana
at an emperial ball.
Married to a much
older prince, she is
now a shining
presence at court.
Onegin, instantly
smitten, pursues her
desperately and in
vain.
In this brief story
line, you can glean
the amount of
passionate turmoil,
pain and tragedy in
Pushkin’s
story– but not
much of it
transpires in
Possokhov’s
ballet.
His two-hour-fifteen-minute-piece is beautifully staged
(Tom Pye) and costumed (Tim Yip). He presents the two couples
in stark, simplistic strokes. At the country estate, the charming
puppy love between Lensky and Olga– well danced by a
charismatic Esteban Hernandez and exuberant new Principal
Madeline Woo – reveals no shadow. Onegin is danced by another
new Principal, Francesco Gabriel Frola, with cold detachment. He
toys with Tatiana, a graceful Sasha De Sola, and takes quite liberal
possession of the inexperienced girl. The bold, complicated lifts
Possokhov is known for, are dramatically enhanced throughout
the ballet by the gorgeous flowing skirts by Crouching Tiger,
Hidden Dragon designer Tim Yip. The choreography of this first
encounter is stirring and the execution flawless, but Frola’s
Onegin is not given the Byron-appeal, the refinement and world
-weary yearning that would make him irresistible to any romantic
woman.
Possokhov skips the letter scene (in Cranko’s version a tender
fantasy of a girl’s dance with her dream lover) and makes up for it
by allowing Tatiana to passionately cling to Onegin. This is over
the top and entirely out of character, but I found it interesting as
it expresses an almost brutal sexual awakening that would mark
her forever. De Sola throws herself into the moves with
conviction and she has a touching moment at the end, when she
raises her arms to hide her face, her devastation.
Something odd happens next. In the following three major scenes
after intermission, the tempo radically speeds up as if Possokhov
ran out of time for the rest of the story. He storms through the
dramatic development as though marking off a bare-bone plot.
There is no time for Lensky’s heartache and humiliation over his
faithless butterfly Olga. There is no clue how shattered Tatiana is
by this new cruelty of Onegin. No clue that Onegin willfully
provokes Lensky because he is bored by the provincial society
and that he acts out his anger at his friend who dragged him there
. One quick waltz with Olga – neither sexy nor seductive--and
bam!, a duel!
There is no time to feel much for the charismatic Lensky of
Esteban Hernandez in his brief solo before the pistols come out.
This is one of the most poignant moments in the opera: the doubt
and pain Tchaikovsky gives to Lensky in the aria that sums up his
brief life “Where have you gone, oh golden days of youth?” In
Cranko’s version, set to a different Tchaikovsky orchestration,
Olga and Tatiana both rush in to hold Lensky back in the last
minute, begging him to forgive his friend. But of course,
contemporary composer Demutsky is not Tchaikovsky.
Possokhov has the good sense to show how both friends secretly
hesitate before aiming at each other, but it all ends in cold
detachment: Onegin shoots, kills his friend, and walks away
without a glance.
The many shortcuts in Possokhov’s rushed narration are
particularly puzzling as he takes plenty of time to add material
that is not essential to the story. He intercuts the major scenes by
abstract group dances representing the seasons. These interludes,
accompanied by Pushkin verses written on the scrim, seemed
distractions from the emotional drama. There is also an added
dream for Tatiana after the duel: a surreal nightmare of people
with animal heads gallivanting through her bedroom. Onegin – as
a bear -- threatens her with a knife as if Dr. Freud had come by
on an unexpected visit to tell us about dangerous repressed
desires.
While Cranko alludes to Onegin’s desolate life abroad (after the
duel) by letting numerous lovers float through his arms like
shadows, Possokhov give his Onegin a brief solo of twisted turns
before his return -- not enough to indicate a disenchanted man
coming home lost and empty-handed.
Even less psychologically astute is his courtly ballroom scene with
Tatiana as the queen of the ball. She is conspicuous in the only
red dress (a strangely uninspired dress) all smiles with a young
looking, handsome husband (Myles Thatcher), also all smiles.
Wasting time with banal court dance and generic pas de deux,
Possokhov then rushes through the dramatic tension. Tatiana,
instead of being profoundly shaken when she suddenly faces
Onegin again, is shocked for only one second before going on
with her happy marriage demonstration, not giving Onegin a
single troubled glance while he stands and stares.
Then, a last fatal short-cut. In the final scene, Possokhov creates
the impression that Tatiana seeks out Onegin, right at the ball, in
the next room. This leaves out the dramatic role reversal,
Onegin’s desperate pursuit of her with letters she does not
answer. Yes, Possokhov’s Onegin pleads, pursues, grasps her, and
Tatiana fleetingly responds, confesses her own passion. It’s a fine
pas de deux with finely marked hesitations by De Sola. There are
again marvelous lifts when Onegin throws her up and wraps her
around his body, but there is not enough emotional weight built
up through the narrative to feel that two lives, honor and integrity
are at risk in the struggle. Suddenly, almost without a climax, she
turns her back on him and walks out through the ballroom door.
Considering the detached, muted impact of the ballet, I felt that
this time, Possokhov was not well served by the score. Demutsky’s
neo-classical, often dissonant orchestration was danceable, but
rarely rousing and certainly neither romantic nor tragic. Touches
of poetry came from the sets of Tom Pye: a raven flying off a
naked branch, a bleak carriage turning and returning for Onegin,
and desolate snow at the end.
In an interview, Possokhov said how much he admired Cranko’s
masterpiece, having danced the role of Lensky himself.” But my Onegin is a different Onegin,“ he said. I am still wondering what
he meant.
Photos: Lindsey Rallo
|