Arthur Meiselman


Yes, the Hubble telescope, comparatively speaking, is a magnificent piece of technology and there's better coming. “Better to see you, my dear!” We also popped a bunch of automatonic humans on the Moon some 50 years ago and haven't done it since.

Think about it...

We take snapshots of little dots of light in the so-called universe, our so-called dimension and we take closeup snapshots of barren rocks that circle along with our rock around a small star. We speculate and agonize about the nature of things and try to emulate our brains in microcosmic boxes. And... we ask... why they, out there, don't contact us.

Would you, if you were they?

It isn't hubris, it's fear of that ancient enduring the thing that goes bump in the night. It has taken us thousands of years to just begin to realize that we, little short-lived we, are that thing.

We spend a large part of our planet's treasury on weapons to protect ourselves. Against what? Ourselves! And we spend an increasingly large part on breaching the final frontier, 'outer space'. Traveling in our tiny, tiny speck of a solar system, a few 100 miles in orbit around our planet, 250000 miles to the moon is not space travel. It's Columbus and the Vikings. It is hard to imagine trillions of miles and hundreds of years to get somewhere ‘out there’. And it should always be noted that what we spend on weapons and space is always at the expense of lifting billions of our fellow human beings out of grinding, life-diminishing poverty. C'est la vie. C'est (the predominantly capitalist) la vie.

Now, we're all excited about sending some of our compatriots to step on the planet Mars. Along with NASA's late-night wet dream there are also commercial ventures to provide emigration to Mars. Columbus and the Vikings in Space. The difference is that these migrants will be going on a one-way trip. One future migrant said: “This is the most exciting adventure of a lifetime. I know that we will be safe and happy.” She obviously was steeped in Ridley Scott's The Martian. Better she should steep back into Blade Runner.

True outer space is currently verboten to humans because...
1. Human physiology cannot tolerate the rigours and mind-bending body alterations that occur in space travel. We are a thin-skinned species and cannot even extend our life spans to a measurable point in cosmic time. We come into life and leave in less than a nano-second of cosmic time. The answer... change the physiology.
And, 2. We have no way of getting there, anywhere within a logical time frame. If it takes 100 Earth years to get somewhere in our galaxy and 100 years to get back, where have we gone? The answer... discover a new energy source and carefully warp
space-time. I know, you couldn't care less. What does this have to do with defeating ISIS, Trump, and the Boston Red Sox?
More on that later.

If you've been reading this column, you know that I'm  an admirer of Star Trek and its visionary creator, Gene Roddenberry. You see, I truly believe that there is no such thing as science fiction. All science is fiction until it cannot be replaced by a newer science. That's the nugget in the idea of... if you can imagine it, it's possible. And if it's possible, it's probable. A neat piece of Zen.

To our good fortune, Roddenberry gathered together some fine science writers and explored what could be, as if it already is. The creation of the character Data... an answer to
Problem 1., no? Warp drive... an answer to Problem 2?

But, a big ‘But’ among all the big butts that are now in vogue
is... we may not be able to defeat the ISIS plague or the worldwide-cloned Trumps or Fenway Park because we have brought our planet to the distinct edge of collapse. That's you and me and our ancestors. It began only 600 years ago when the human population crossed over the line of sustainability. The oceans are dying, the air is dying, and our food supply is malingering. The clocks tick, the lips lick, and the dreams stick like fading decals on a transparent wall.

Why don't they contact us? If you knew who they are and you were they... would you?

Post Your Comments
On This Article Here

Share This Page

View other readers’ comments in Letters to the Editor

Arthur Meiselman is a playwright, writer and the Editor of Scene4. He also directs the Talos Ensemble and
produces for Aemagefilms.
Read his Blog.
For more of his commentary and articles, check the Archives.

©2016 Arthur Meiselman
©2016 Publication Scene4 Magazine



July 2016

Cover | This Issue | inView | inFocus | inSight | Perspectives | Comments | Blogs | Contact Us | Recent Issues | Special Issues | Masthead | Contacts&Links | Submissions | Advertising | Subscribe | Books | Your Support | Privacy | Terms | Archives

Search This Issue


Search The Archives



Share in Facebook


Scene4 (ISSN 1932-3603), published monthly by Scene4 Magazine - International Magazine of Arts and Media. Copyright © 2000-2016 AVIAR-DKA LTD - AVIAR MEDIA LLC. All rights reserved. Now in our 17th year of publication with Worldwide Readership in 141 Countries and comprehensive archives of over 9000 web pages (36,000 print pages).

Scientific American -
Penguin Books-USA
Character Flaws by Les Marcott at
Thai Airways at Scene4 Magazine